HiveCheck
Home  /  Evidence example
Evidence example

A history you can
read in context.

An illustrative example of the evidence approach. The values below are synthetic and do not describe a customer, a real home or a live product screen.

Worked example

What changed.
What is missing.
What remains a question.

A daily humidity series is shown across 21 days. Two days have no values. An example marker identifies when works were recorded.

The later values are lower. The series alone cannot establish why they changed or whether the works were sufficient.

Download example data
A property history, in context.Relative humidity · daily example values
Illustrative example
Illustrative daily relative humidity over 21 daysSynthetic data. Humidity varies from 72 to 77 percent early in the period. Days 8 and 9 have no readings. After an illustrative works marker on day 11, the values range from 71 to 60 percent. The change does not prove its cause or repair adequacy.40%50%60%70%80%Data gapWorks recordedDay 1Day 11Day 21

Make gaps visibleDays without readings stay visible.

Review measured changeUse the history alongside other evidence.

Synthetic data explaining the approach. This is not a live product screen or a customer case.

Read the example

Three things to keep visible.

A useful record should make the basis and limits of its interpretation clear.

01

The measurements

This example uses daily relative-humidity values. In a real deployment, the measurement interval, location, sensor specification and calculation basis need to be known.

02

The missing evidence

No values are provided for days 8 and 9. The line breaks at that point; the missing period is not filled in as normal conditions.

03

The interpretation

HiveCheck does not decide risk. A qualified professional interprets the evidence; this example supplies no risk rating, hazard category or repair verdict. Any reference comparison requires its own source and applicability checks.

For an actual deployment

Agree the evidence
your team needs.

Use this worked example to frame a discussion about the measurements, outputs and workflows appropriate to your properties.

Record detailWhat to agree
Property, room and equipmentIdentity, assignment, placement and relevant device specification.
Measurements and qualityUnits, timestamps, sampling, aggregation, coverage and missingness.
Reference comparisonSource, version, time basis and whether it applies.
Review and useAccess, export, human review and handoff into existing processes.
A practical first step

Start with a question worth answering.

Choose a focused group of homes, agree what your team needs to understand, and review the evidence before deciding what comes next.

Discuss a pilot