Managed IoT monitoring for social housing

Connected homes.
Informed people.

HiveCheck brings connected sensors, traceable property data and investigation tools together. Give your housing teams a clearer picture of conditions across the homes you manage.

We provide the evidence. Professionals assess risk.Your housing professionals decide what it means and what action is needed.

Flexible IoT monitoring.New deployments or compatible existing devices.

Traceable property evidence.The source, history, context and visible gaps.

Professional judgement.Your experts assess risk and determine the response.

Why HiveCheck

IoT monitoring that fits
the way you work.

Connect the property, organise the evidence and keep professional judgement at the centre of the housing response.

01

Keep the equipment that works

Build around compatible sensors and installation arrangements you already have, or ask HiveCheck to manage a new deployment.

Flexible deployment
02

Use the evidence in your systems

Take CORE as an independent data service, add CONTEXT for investigation, or connect the evidence to your own systems.

Choose your service
03

Keep decisions with professionals

HiveCheck makes measurements and their context reviewable. Risk, hazard, cause, priority and required action are assessed by qualified professionals.

Our approach to judgement
From readings to useful evidence

Make the next decision
better informed.

IoT sensors capture conditions in the property. HiveCheck brings the readings into context, alongside resident reports, inspections and your existing housing processes.

01

Understand conditions between visits

See measured conditions over time, including recurring patterns and periods where readings are missing.

Between visits
02

Support an investigation

Give colleagues a clearer record of what was measured, when it happened and the context of any comparison.

During an investigation
03

Review change after works

Look at subsequent conditions alongside inspection findings and resident feedback to inform follow-up.

After an intervention
The evidence behind the decision

See the history.
Keep the context.

A reading becomes more useful when your team can see its source, the period it covers and what is missing.

Explore a worked example of the evidence approach, with its limitations made clear.

Explore the example
A property history, in context.Relative humidity · daily example values
Illustrative example
Illustrative daily relative humidity over 21 daysSynthetic data. Humidity varies from 72 to 77 percent early in the period. Days 8 and 9 have no readings. After an illustrative works marker on day 11, the values range from 71 to 60 percent. The change does not prove its cause or repair adequacy.40%50%60%70%80%Data gapWorks recordedDay 1Day 11Day 21

Make gaps visibleDays without readings stay visible.

Review measured changeUse the history alongside other evidence.

Synthetic data explaining the approach. This is not a live product screen or a customer case.

For your housing team

Different responsibilities.
A shared understanding.

From the person investigating a concern to the people assessing a wider rollout, each team needs a clear view of what the service provides.

A practical first step

Start with a question worth answering.

Choose a focused group of homes, agree what your team needs to understand, and review the evidence before deciding what comes next.